The Truth Set Them Free
Injustice in Perugia
A site detailing the wrongful conviction of Amanda Knox & Raffaele Sollecito
My response to Harry Rag
I had a discussion with Harry Rag on Facebook. I asked him to stop posting lies and misinformation about Amanda Knox all over the internet. He responded with a challenge. He asked me to prove that he spread lies and misinformation. His challenge was an easy one.

Here is my response to Harry Rag,

Harry Rag,

Anyone that has done any research at all on the Amanda Knox case has seen your name and knows what you are all about. You are anywhere and everywhere online cutting and pasting misinformation and lies. If you ask me, those two terms are one in the same. In my opinion, if you knowingly post misinformation or intentionally post statements out of context to try and manipulate a different result then you are telling lies. It isn't the amount of different lies that you tell that makes the list long. It's the amount of times you continually tell the same lies. Most of your statements are simply your opinion and not based on any facts whatsoever. You are entitled to your opinion. The problem is, that along with your opinion you also intentionally post misinformation and tell blatant lies. Here are some of your quotes.

The first set of quotes are all in regard to the hand written letter that Amanda wrote November 6th. 2007. This topic is where you blatantly lie about the facts.

HR - "Amanda Knox's voluntary confession that she was involved in Meredith's murder and the fact that this confession contained significant elements of truth."

HR - "Amanda Knox voluntarily admitted that she involved in Meredith's murder in her handwritten note to the police on 6 November 2007"

HR - "Amanda herself admitted she was present when Meredith was murdered in her handwritten note to the police on 6 November."

HR - "Amanda Knox admitted on several occasions that she was at the cottage on the evening of 1 November and she voluntarily admitted that she was involved in Meredith's murder in her handwritten note to the police on 6 November"

The letter was far from a confession. Keep in mind that this letter was written on November 6th. Her Illegal interrogation at just ended earlier that morning. She got minimal rest and then wrote the letter. She was still suffering from exhaustion and was still mentally traumatized from the illegal interrogation. With that said, she in no way confessed to anything. You conveniently leave out the part of the letter printed below,

In Amanda's words, "If there are still parts that don't make sense, please ask me. I'm doing the best I can, just like you are. Please believe me at least in that, although I understand if you don't. All I know is that I didn't kill Meredith, and so I have nothing but lies to be afraid of."

That doesn't sound like a confession to me.
You can read the entire transcript here - The Illegal Interrogation of Amanda Knox

Listed below are just a few of your quotes regarding the footprints. You have the right to your opinion that the footprints were blood, after all the prosecution said it was blood, but it was never proven in court. The Prosecution was unable to prove the footprints were blood. The footprints were tested but no DNA from Meredith was present. How could that be? You know all of this information but you continue to cut and paste all of these quotes.

HR - "There were two different size bloody footprints in the apartment, indicating that there was more than one person involved in this crime. Not even the defense attorneys are disputing that, even though they do claim that the bloody footprints are not Amanda's or Raffaele's."

HR - "The bloody footprints at the crime scene also implicate Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito. Knox’s footprint was set in Meredith’s blood in the hallway outside Meredith’s room."

HR - "Amanda Knox's footprints were set in Meredith's blood in the hallway"

HR - "Amanda Knox’s footprints were found set in Meredith’s blood in two places in the hallway of the new wing of the cottage. One print was exiting her own room, and one print was outside Meredith’s room, facing into the room. These bloody footprints were only revealed under luminol"

HR - "The five instances of Amanda Knox’s DNA mixed with Meredith’s blood in three different locations in the cottage in Via della Pergola: the bathroom, the hallway, and Filomena’s bedroom, where the break-in was staged."

HR - "Amanda's bare footprints set in Meredith's blood"

HR - "It should also be noted that a mixture of Amanda Knox? DNA and Meredith?s blood was also found in Filomena?s room"

HR - "bloody bare footprints which show up with luminol and fit Knox and Sollecito’s feet"

You repeat that the footprints were in blood every chance you get. You repeat blood over and over again. Meredith's DNA was not detected in a single one of the bare footprints revealed with luminol. No test was ever performed to establish that any of these prints were made with blood rather than one of the many other substances that react with luminol. No comparable footprints were found inside the room where Meredith was killed. Source -

Altogether, there were six latent bare footprints, three in the hallway, three in Amanda's room, and none in Meredith's room. Each was swabbed and tested for DNA, and not one of them revealed Meredith's DNA. Is it common sense, therefore, to conclude that they were made with her blood? These prints were never tested and never confirmed to be blood at all. Source -

HR - "The woman's bloody shoeprint on the pillow under Meredith's body matched Amanda Knox's foot size, but was incompatible with Meredith's shoe size."

This is a complete lie. Every print, set in blood, in Meredith's room belongs to Rudy Guede.

Click here to view the photographic evidence regarding the shoe prints.

HR - "No-one managed to the scale the wall and climb through the window when Sollecito's defense team attempted to show that it was possible."

The defense has conducted experiments showing that a man of Guede's height could easily have gotten through the broken window at the cottage. The building is perched on a steep hillside, so the window is adjacent to and within reach of a walkway. The intruder could have gone through the window by using a planter box at the edge of the walkway as a starting point. Alternatively, bars on a lower-story window could have been used like a ladder to gain access. Source(includes photo) -

HR - "Amanda Knox's false accusation of Diya Lumumba after she had been informed that Sollectio had told police that she had asked him to lie for her and he had stopped providing her with an alibi"

We all know that Amanda was given Lumumba's name and told to imagine he killed Meredith. You conveniently leave that out and suggest that Amanda gave Lumumba's name to the police.

The information below is from The website that you openly promote. Without any proof whatsoever, bleach receipts are suggested on the site. The site even tries to guess what Raffaele may have been searching for online. No proof was ever offered of any bleach receipts or of Raffale's Google search history. These are lies. This was written so the rumor would continue to be spread about mop buckets and clean up efforts. Of course we all know that never happened. Seeing these lies on the website that you promote would lead me to believe that you were also promoting other lies and misinformation using different names and aliases online. That is my opinion of course but the information below would lead many people to believe this. These lies make me sick. It was misinformation like this that was spread like cancer all over the media.

0830 Bleach receipt supplied by the market (?) - RS/AK in bed (per RS/AK)
0915 Bleach receipt supplied by the market (?) - RS/AK in bed (per RS/AK)
0532 Internet activity noted at RS’s computer, (Googling ‘Bleach’ & ‘Blood’ perhaps ?).

You say that the DNA evidence was independently reviewed in 2008. The evidence was not independently reviewed by experts approved by Amanda's defense team. The DNA was reviewed by Renato Biondo, the boss of the lab technicians that did the original test. Not exactly an independent review.

Read about the DNA review here -

You cut and paste your lies anywhere and everywhere you can. Here are a few websites that I used for reference. There are many more. This is just a sample.,people,news,oj-simpson-lawyer-john-q-kelly-slams-public-lynching-of-amanda-knox-meredith-kercher

Cut and paste your opinions all you want. We are all entitled to our opinion. Stop including all of the misinformation and lies. These are real lives that you are trying to destroy. This isn't a game.